so i created this to see how many people prioritize that over adding new features in SP...people cant normally work being constantly scared to lose all their work and it makes it impossible to work on a big asset, because adding a lot of layers makes SP even more unstable...
so if you re more concerned not to lose your work instead of having new features, I need your vote!

thank you!

Would be awesome if one could paint normal info on a special layer that then would be added to the normal channel, and thus would affect all the smart masks and materials.

Add an additional map shortcut so we can see and swap quickly bettween baked map to watch if all is ok.

c = Channel
m = Material
a = Additional map ?

masking out mesh with color id, basically have the ability to mask out your mesh that way you can, if you export your lowpoly as all one mesh and you have intricate details or stuff that blocks you from texturing it can make it difficulty, it would make it an effective way to mask out your mesh

It's kind of annoying having to export your maps to visualize how your height maps will look with parallax or tessellation, and it'd be amazing to have this kind of feature in the editor like Designer has

Ability to import all or geo from an Alembic file.

It would be really helpful to be able to add an image into a fill layer and then convert that into a paint layer.

For cleaning up AO as an example, doing this and then using smudge to neaten up issues would be really nifty.

Baking a large amount of meshes can be a pain because it has to be done individually. We need a batch baking system with global settings.

Sometimes for a UDIM Workaround, multiple texture sets have identical fill layers, smart materials, masks or effects. For better iteration, it would be great to ALSO have the ability to INSTANCE instead of JUST COPYING. For instance, I would love to be able to change parameters of a single fill layer, generator or effects and have them automatically be exactly the same in all other texture sets where I instanced that fill layer, generator or effects. This would be great for all elements that compose the layer stack. So that we can have INSTANCED SMART MATERIALS for FAST ITERATION.

Wtf? Why does the application order form not point - address so I can get a magnifying glass on the mail.
Seriously, why not support high resolutions?

it will be great for faster work

Could be great to have nativelly integrated NON PBR shader in SP!

I don't like the way I need to click a edit button to enter a numeric value (the button that looks like a pen in a small button). It seems like a double click would be a more traditional method for editing values. This is the way it works in Substance Designer which is the way I'd expect it to work. And as a bonus, it would declutter the interface a little bit.

The symmetry system don't work properly when I'm using multiple meshs to bake each part separately. When I am exporting all separate objects together, the Substance Painter create a bounding box covering all objects, but it would be better if the symmetry center was based on a pivot point from one of the separated objects (having the ability to choose which object).

Ability to drag and drop textures , environments, directly from the shelf to the viewport

You can enter into support for 4k monitor?
I bought one 4k monitor to use this program, and is currently unusable.

Perhaps some way to color code masks that have associated generators, fills, etc. Since they do not show up unless the mask is selected.